As the World Cup ended the US/Israel/Iran ceasefire collapsed. This has pushed up oil prices, pushed down bond prices and is putting pressure on equity markets looking for an excuse to pause and worrying about an AI bubble.
Oil Prices
The ceasefire drop in oil prices has all but reversed.
Oil Prices 2026 to Date
Source: Morningstar, 24/07/2026, Oil Price Brent Crude PR, 01/01/2026-23/07/2026, Daily Price, USD.
This puts pressure on inflation, which feeds into interest rate expectations and bond yields.
US 10 Year Treasury Yields 2026 to Date
Source: Federal Reserve Board, via FRED, 24/07/2026, US 10-Year Treasury Yield, 02/01/2026-22/07/2026.
Here we see US 10 year treasury yields rising (prices falling) in 2026 so far. The picture around the world is pretty similar. US 10 year yields are up around 0.5% so far in 2026 from 4.2% to 4.7%, UK 10 year gilts have risen from 4.5% to 5.0%, the same Japanese yields have gone from 2.1% to 2.8% in Germany yields have gone from 2.9% to 3.2%.
So far you would have to say Andy Burnham’s appointment has been pretty neutral, UK bond markets are following the world geopolitical story not British politics.
US Big Tech
On Wednesday evening we saw Q2 results from Alphabet (Google), whose shares fell almost 7% yesterday, and Tesla, whose shares fell 14.5% yesterday.
As predicted in my May update, Elon’s other business SpaceX broke all records in its IPO and lifted off to a 65% gain on its initial IPO price, with Elon becoming the first trillionaire ‘on paper’. The launch quickly ran out of thrust and SpaceX has fallen, 50% at one point and is now some 13% below its IPO value and that’s before the private equity and employee lock-ins start to expire on the 6th August. With these two declines Elon becomes the first trillionaire to fall back to billionaire status, on paper.
Whilst each of these companies faces differing opportunities and challenges there are a few common themes:
- Building new technology is incredibly expensive
- Getting to a profitable business in a new technology can take much longer than you think
- When companies undertake material capital expenditure, how those get accounted for and particularly the speed with which capital assets are written down can have a big impact on profits. Does the cash spend generate more revenue and how long will that revenue last before more cash needs to be spent to maintain it? Is it capital expenditure or just increased recurring costs?
- When large amounts of cash are needed to keep competing, more than is covered by current cash flow, it is inevitable existing shareholders will get diluted through additional equity issues to raise cash or leveraged up with bonds making the business riskier
Alphabet’s revenue and profit increases beat Wall Street expectations, but its capital expenditure is still rising beyond initial estimates and for the first quarter in 20 years Alphabet spent more cash than it generated. Alphabet burnt through $6bn in cash in Q2. These big cap US tech companies have flipped from being high margin, capex light to needing high capex and no one yet knows what ultimate profit margins in the AI world will be.
Alphabet just completed a massive fund raise through new shares and preference shares, raising $84bn and diluting current shareholders. Will it be enough?
Just twelve months ago Elon promised that Tesla’s robotaxis would be available to ‘half the population of the US by the end of 2025’. That’s to 170 million people. As recently as October 2025 Elon suggested he would have as many as 1,500 robotaxis operating in his Texas trial areas by the end of 2025. According to website Electric-Vehicle.com that figure at the end of 2025 was more like 170, with most robotaxis still having a human supervisor on board. This week Elon pushed any expectation of substantial revenues from robotaxis out into 2027. A huge gap between talked up expectations and reality.
The impact here is that the US big tech – the Magnificent 7 – mostly all spenders in the AI race and with substantial representation in indices based on market cap weightings, are now clearly dragging down equity indices rather than pushing them up.
Mag 7 ETF vs Nasdaq 2026 to Date
Source: Morningstar, 24/07/2026, NASDAQ Composite TR USD, Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, 31/12/2025-23/07/2026, Cumulative Total Return %, GBP.
The Nasdaq is now off 7% from its peak value in June.
Tideway Portfolio Returns
Against the headwinds of falling bond and equity indices in recent weeks, Tideway’s portfolios have been crabbing sideways after strong returns. On a relative basis it could be worse.
Fixed Income
As of this week Tideway’s Diversified Fixed Income portfolios were up 1.0% over 6 months and 5.4% over 12 months before Tideway’s fees. Rising yields and interest rate expectations have taken their toll but we have protected capital values and are now enjoying c0.5% p.a. average higher income from our bonds.
As a comparison, BlackRock’s iShares UK Corporate bond ETF (SLXX) is down -0.9% over 6 months and up 3.2% over a year.
Equities
Again, as of this week Tideway’s Core Equity portfolio was up around 6.5% over 6 months and 21.8% over 12 months.
By comparison, MSCI World Index is up about 9.4% over 6 months and 21.3% over 12 months. All numbers sourced from FE Analytics and Morningstar.
Whilst our Equity Income portfolio has been outperforming world indices for some time it’s good to see our Core Equity portfolio now matching these returns. If the Magnificent 7 keep pulling indices down as they have done so far this year, we might yet see further out performance.
In the last update Nick highlighted our Redwheel Global Intrinsic Value (GIV) fund which has just 3% tech exposure versus the MSCI world index’s 30% exposure. This fund’s 12 month and recent performance, along with that of our other value manager, Schroder Recovery, has been fantastic.
Schroder Global Recovery, Redwheel GIV vs MSCI World Index 1 Year Returns
These are two of our biggest equity fund holdings and 4 out of 5 of our biggest equity fund holdings have delivered more than the S&P 500 in the last 12 months.

